The necessary untameability of terms as “the Anthropocene”: epistemological challenges and relational ontology

Authors

  • Renzo Taddei Autor
  • Davide Scarso Autor
  • Nuno Castanheira Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v11.1009

Keywords:

ecology, sustainability, ontology, epistemology, politics

Abstract

In this interview, conducted via e-mail by Davide Scarso and Nuno Pereira Castanheira between the months of November and December 2020, Professor Renzo Taddei (Unifesp) discusses the meaning of the term Anthropocene and its implications, based on the theoretical contributions of Deborah Danowski, Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Donna Haraway, Isabelle Stengers and Bruno Latour, among others. The interviewee emphasizes the need of avoiding the reduction of the Anthropocene and similar terms to scientific concepts, thus preserving their ability to induce new perspectives and existential transformation, and resisting the temptation of objectifying domination of a world that is more complex and messier than classical epistemology would like to acknowledge.

Published

2020-12-26

How to Cite

The necessary untameability of terms as “the Anthropocene”: epistemological challenges and relational ontology. (2020). Revista Opinião Filosófica, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v11.1009