Evidence-Based Medicine and Patient-Centred Care
a Patient’s Best Interest Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v14.1072Keywords:
Medicine, Patient’s Interest, Medical Diagnosis, Diseases, Evidence-Based MedicineAbstract
Proponents of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) argue that EBM’s approach to medicine promotes good clinical decisions while it escapes adverse issues such as implicit bias. However, EBM approaches the causation of diseases from a homogenous standpoint; that is, EBM overgeneralises evidence and the intervention measures it provides. As a result, proponents of Patient-Centred Care (PCC) allude that the strictness of EBM towards evidence impairs it from considering case-by-case treatment of patients but a generalised method of intervention. Given this problem, I argue that EBM cannot be considered a medical approach to practising medicine and conducting medical research that is in the best interest of individual patients, especially patients that prefer alternative interventions other than the methods of EBM. I conclude by drawing from the best features of EBM and PCC to create an alternative that accommodates the interests of both EBM and PCC patients.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Edmund Terem Ugar (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use, in scientific, educational, non-commercial applications, with citation of the source.
The papers published in Revista Opinião Filosófica are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
