The recognition of vulnerability for an interspecies and intersectional justice based on care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v15n2.1229Palabras clave:
Care, Ecofeminism, Intersectionality, Interspecies Justice, VulnerabilityResumen
In this paper, we aim to establish a right to be cared as part of an interspecies and intersectional concept of justice. This approach recognizes vulnerability as an intrinsic characteristic of all living beings, regardless of gender, class, race, capacity, or species. Therefore, vulnerability is considered general, comprehensive, and fundamental to humans and other-than-humans, differently from modern ethical, political, and ontological theories that usually presuppose a paradigm of ‘invulnerability,’ albeit undeclared. The ideal of invulnerability does not represent the inner condition of living beings but sustains it as a foundation for systems of domination based on hierarchical value dualisms. Acknowledging the vulnerability related to interdependence without rejecting or misrepresenting it, is essential to overcoming these dualisms. Also, it demands recognizing that the distribution of care activities is limited and affects individuals differently depending on their social position, considering race, class, gender, capacity, and species. The right to be cared for due to the vulnerability aims to protect individuals and political minority groups from inequalities and injustices. Beyond negative rights, it requires protective measures imposing care duties on moral agents, social institutions, and the State for which we have proposed an universal interspecies guidelines. To be recognized as someone with moral and political value means having one’s vulnerability taken into account. Consequently, not being cared for in one’s vulnerability at the right time and to the proper extent, taking singularity and the contextual analysis into consideration so the particularities of the situation and specificities of the individual are adequately addressed, is to be the object of injustice. We conclude that a right to be cared for is part of a pluralistic concept of justice that encompasses an interspecies and intersectional perspective opposing the logic of domination and building the path of the logic of care.
Referencias
ADAMS, Carol J.; GRUEN, Lori. Groundwork. In: ADAMS, Carol J.; GRUEN, Lori. (eds). Ecofeminism: feminist intersections with other animals & the Earth. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014. p. 7-36.
BAIER, Annete. Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
BAIER, Annete. Moral Prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
BAIER, Annete. The Commons of the Mind. Chicago. Open Court, 1997.
BUTLER, Judith. Frames of war: when is life grievable? London: Verson, 2009.
CLEMENT, Grace). Care, Autonomy, and Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
CRENSHAW, Kimberlé. Documento para o encontro de especialistasem aspectos da discriminação racial relativos ao gênero. Estudos Feministas, ano 10, 1o semestre, p. 171-188, 2002.
ENGSTER, Daniel. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. New York: Oxford, 2007.
FELIPE, Sônia. O cuidado na ética ecoanimalista feminista. In: BORGES, Maria de Lourdes; TIBURI, Márcia (Org.) Filosofia: machismos e feminismos, Florianópolis: EdUFSC, 2014, p. 275-298.
GAARD, Greta.; GRUEN, Lori. Ecofeminism: toward global justice and planetary health. In: ZIMMERMAN, M. E. et al (Eds.). Environmental philosophy: from animal rights to radical ecology. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005, p. 155-177.
GEBARA, Ivone. Conversando sobre ecofeminismos: entrevista com Ivone Gebara. In: ROSENDO, Daniela, OLIVEIRA, Fábio, CARVALHO, Príscila; KUHNEN, Tânia. Ecofeminismos: fundamentos teóricos e práxis interseccionais. 2. ed. Rio de janeiro: Ape’Ku, 2024.
GILLIGAN, Carol. Joining the resistance. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.
GILSON, Erin. Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression. Hypatia, v. 26, n. 2, p. 308-332, 2011.
GOODIN, Robert E. Protecting the Vulnerable. A Re-Analysis of our Social Responsibilities. University of Chicago Press, 1985.
JOHNSON, Casey R. Epistemic care: vulnerability, inquiry, and social epistemology. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2023.
KHEEL, Marti. Nature ethics: an ecofeminist perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
KHEEL, Marti. From heroic to holistic ethics: the ecofeminist challenge. In: STERBA, James (ed.). Earth Ethics: Environmental Ethics, Animal Rights and Practical Applications, 2. ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000, p. 199-212.
KHEEL, Marti. A contribuição do ecofeminismo para a ética animal. In: ROSENDO, Daniela, OLIVEIRA, Fábio, CARVALHO, Príscila; KUHNEN, Tânia. Ecofeminismos: fundamentos teóricos e práxis interseccionais. 1. ed. Rio de janeiro: Ape’Ku, 2019, p. 29-42.
KUHNEN, Tânia; ROSENDO, Daniela. Ecofeminismo. In: Blog de Ciência da Universidade Estadual de Campinas: Mulheres na Filosofia, v. 7, n. 2, p. 16-40, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.blogs.unicamp.br/mulheresnafilosofia/ecofeminismos/ Acesso em: 01 out. 2024.
KUHNEN, Tânia A. Ética do cuidado: diálogos necessários para a igualdade de gênero. Florianópolis: EdUFSC, 2021.
KUHNEN, Tânia A. Vulnerabilidade e desigualdade moral de gênero: cuidado e direitos na formação do agente moral. Kalagatos, v. 15, n. 2, mai.-ago., p. 85-112, 2018.
KITTAY, Eva Feder. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge, 1999.
KITTAY, Eva Feder. A feminist Public Ethic of Care Meets the New Communitarian Family Policy. Ethics, v. 111, n. 3, april, p. 523-547, 2001.
FERDINAND, Malcom. Uma ecologia decolonial: pensar a partir do mundo caribenho. Trad. Leticia Mei. São Paulo: Ubu, 2022.
FINEMAN, Martha Albertson. The Neutered Mother, The sexual Family and other Twentieth Century Tragedies, Nova Iorque: Routledge, 1995..
FINEMAN, Martha Albertson. The Autonomy Myth: a Theory of Dependency. Nova Iorque: The New Press, 2004.
PLUMWOOD, Val. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge, 1993.
RUDDICK, Sarah. Maternal Thinking. In: TREBILCOT, Joyce (ed.). Mothering: Essays in Feminist Theory. Totowa/New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984.
RUDDICK, Sarah. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.
WARREN, Karen. Ecofeminist Philosophy: a Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
ZIRBEL, Ilze; KUHNEN, Tânia. O cuidado como resistência e enfrentamento de práticas nocivas à vida coletiva. Schème: Revista Eletrônica de Psicologia e Epistemologia Genéticas, v. 14, n. esp., p. 179-208, 2022.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Tania Kuhnen, Ilze Zirbel, Daniela Rosendo (Autor)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
A submissão de originais para este periódico implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais, científicas, não comerciais, desde que citada a fonte.
Os artigos publicados na Revista Opinião Filosófica estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
