Marx's Notion of Labor as a Representational Concretization of the Logico-Hegelian Notion of Social Being

Authors

  • Antônio C R Costa PUCRS/PPGFil Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.2025.v16.1180

Keywords:

Marx's notion of labor., Hegel's notion of social being., Operation of representational concretization.

Abstract

Initially, this article reviews the Hegelian notion of Syllogism, taken in its most general form, and explains the distinction between Passive syllogisms and Active syllogisms, a distinction that Hegel himself established, but did not emphasize. The article then shows that Active syllogisms constitute the operatory core of the Hegelian notion of Subjective idea. Next, the article examines in detail the Subjective idea of Social being, which Hegel established under the name Gender. Finally, the article introduces the notion of the operation of representational concretization of a Subjective idea and shows that the logical structure of the notion of Labor adopted by Marx in his writings on Political Economy can be seen as a particular representational concretization of the Idea of Social being.

References

ENGELS, F. Esboço para uma Crítica da Economia Política. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2021.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Enciclopédia das Ciências Filosóficas em Compêndio (1830) - A Ciência da Lógica. São Paulo: Loyola, 1995.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Ciência da Lógica - Doutrina do Conceito. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2018.

MARX, K. Crítica do Nacionalismo Econômico [1845]. Lisboa: Antígona, 2009.

MARX, K. Manuscritos Econômico-Filosóficos [1844]. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2017.

MARX, K. O Capital - Livro 1. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.

MORSELEY, F.; SMITH, T. Marx's Capital and Hegel's Logic - A Reexamination. Boston: Brill, 2014.

NETTO, J. P.; BRAZ, M. Economia Política - Uma Introdução Crítica. São Paulo: Cortez, 2008.

Published

2025-05-31

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Marx’s Notion of Labor as a Representational Concretization of the Logico-Hegelian Notion of Social Being. (2025). Revista Opinião Filosófica, 16. https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.2025.v16.1180